Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]

Facts:

  • Mr Bolam was undergoing electro convulsive therapy as part of a mental illness.
  • Doctor did not give any relaxant drugs and as a result Mr Bolam suffered a serious fracture.
  • If given relaxants, there a small risk of death. If not given, there a small risk of fracture.
  • Mr Bolam is claiming that the doctors were in breach of duty by NOT issuing relaxants or using a manual restraint to reduce risks.

Problems:

  • To prove breach of duty Mr Bolam has to prove that other doctors would have acted differently to the doctors on the day.

Decision:

  • The hospital was not liable because expert witnesses all opposed the use of relaxants.
  • They also opposed the use of a manual restraint because that increases the risk of fracture.

Leave a comment

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started